JF Ptak Science Books LLC Post 372
Empty and Missing Things, Part 19.
Returning to Jean-Jacques Scheuchzer's* magical, inventive, fact-bending naive-surreal work on universal history based on the Old Testament, I've found these two glorious and odd images of the Tower of Babel. The first ("Genesis Cap.XI.v.4. Orthographia Turris.Mediummetalis") is terrific, shocking even in its abrupt construction and flat-out stumpiness, because it is one of a very small minority that shows the structure to be canonical, with a little church at top. The enormous stairway is just completely out of proportion to the purpose of the structure, the effort falling into some sort of odd advanced-child category.
If Italo Calvin's "Invisible Cities" or (better yet) Jorge Borges' "The Circular Ruins" were to be illustrated, this image would fit right in.
The other very unusual bit here, is that Scheuchzer also provides a plan for the city that was to be built around the tower--I'm pretty sure that I haven't seen references to this before, and the Biblical references to it are no help whatsoever in determining its physical aspects.
There are probably very few things that could be as blank or as empty as combative, competing, nonsensical and completely self-referential language or communication. Well, except for Scheuchzer's very empty town plan locating the tower in an urban setting--a listless place of surrounded circles of nothingness for a place in which everything is said and nothing is understood. Ground Zero for blank
language.
Notes:
Two interesting books that I should mention that address the ideas of fantastic/imaginary architecture and decay are C. W. Thomsen, Visionary Architecture: From Babylon to Virtual Reality, (Prestel, 1994) ; and Paul Zucker, Fascination of Decay (Gregg Press, 1968).
*
Well, the tower is not ADA-accessible, even if it's a ramp. The stairs would test the faithful, though. Presumably, that's an important church on top. The discontinuity in the line of the stairs is odd. I wonder why it was drawn that way?
Posted by: Jeff | 15 November 2008 at 12:43 PM
You're right--45% does not a good ramp make, unless you wanted to go really fast going down. I guess too that it *is* an important something, some religious communicator, up there on top, otherwise what a disappointment it would be! I guess it was drawn this way because (a) it looked pretty, (b) almost no one would look at the drawing as hard as Jeff, and (c or 3)there were 270-odd more to do. Plus, its the Tower of Babel--what would it have been like, like, if the thing made sense?
Posted by: John Ptak | 15 November 2008 at 01:08 PM